TapprTumblr

Today on my CNN show “The Lead” we’ll be talking about the Yahoo! acquisition of your beloved Tumblr.

So here’s my question for you, tumblrers: What does it mean to you?

Are you impressed?

Is the meaning of this, as David Karp suggests, that “(s)imply, Tumblr gets better faster”? Is that it? All it will mean is “more resources to draw from”?

It can’t really be that simple, can it?

TechCrunch doesn’t think so. 

Ingrid Lundern writes: “Do a search on Tumblr for “yahoo” and you get a stream of distress, interspersed with the occasional bit of helpless resignation, and some calls for activism. The voices of reluctant acceptance (usually because of the aforementioned cash situation) or anything like positivity are few and far between. No outright enthusiasm.”

She posts this:

On the flip side, Forbes contributor Peter Cohan writes that “Yahoo’s Tumblr Buy Fails 4 Tests Of A Successful Acquisition,” suggesting among other notes that Yahoo! paid way too (a reported $1.1 billion.)

There are also those calling the acquisition “bold”  and saying it shows Yahoo! chief executive Marissa Meyer “means business.”

Karp pledges: “We won’t let you down.”

Do you believe him? 

What do you think this will mean for your tumblr accounts, short term and long term?

Weigh in, I’d love to know what you think.

- Jake

“I stand here with mixed emotions of both joy and sadness for me today.  I don’t think I’m much different than Medal of Honor recipients Sergeant First Class Petry and former Staff Sergeant Giunta and feeling conflicted with this medal I now wear. But joy comes from recognition for us doing our jobs as soldiers on distant battlefields, but is countered by the constant reminder of the loss of our battle buddies, my battle buddies, my soldiers, my friends.

“I accept this tremendous honor on behalf of all soldiers who have served with me that day. This award is for the eight soldiers that didn’t make it and for the rest of the team that fought valiantly and magnificently that day.  I will forever be humbled by their bravery, their commitment to service and their loyalty to one another.

“Serving our nation in uniform is a privilege, especially during times of war. Like my grandfather, my father, and my brothers, I am proud to have the opportunity to serve with some of the finest soldiers today, not only during our mission in Afghanistan, but on all my deployments and tours during my 11 years in the Army.”

- former Staff Sergeant Clint Romesha

(from the CNN Washington bureau, please excuse the TV coding above)

During CNN’s coverage of the confirmation hearings for former Senator Chuck Hagel I mentioned how the Vietnam war experiences of Secretary of State John Kerry and Hagel shaped their worldviews. I mentioned that Kerry had killed a man in Vietnam, though I wasn’t sure about Hagel.

Here’s a little bit more about the Kerry story, from a Nightline in 2004:

ABC News Transcripts

June 22, 2004 Tuesday

SHOW: NIGHTLINE (11:35 PM ET) - ABC

NIGHTLINE BAPTISM BY FIRE



June 22 2004

TED KOPPEL, ABC NEWS

It was dangerous and harrowing duty.

GENE THORSON, VIETNAM VETERAN

It was nervous-wracking, tense at all times because you never really knew what was really going to happen. You were like a big bull’s eye going up and down the river.

TED KOPPEL

He killed an enemy soldier at close quarters.

FRED SHORT, VIETNAM VETERAN

When you’re close enough to see them to count the whiskers on their face, to be that close to someone, it becomes very personal. And that would affect anyone, I would suspect.


TED KOPPEL

His experience in Vietnam changed him forever.

SENATOR JOHN KERRY,

DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE

Well, I think it affects anybody who carries a gun in another country, shooting at other human beings. Unless you’re insensitive, it has an impact on you.

graphics: baptism by fire

TED KOPPEL

Tonight, “Baptism By Fire,” echoes of a distance war.

graphics: ABC NEWS: Nightline

ANNOUNCER

From ABC News, this is “Nightline.” Reporting from Washington, Ted Koppel.

TED KOPPEL

(Off Camera) In war time, governments award medals for behavior that could send a man to prison in times of peace. That can play games with a man’s head. It’s one reason why so many veterans who’ve been in combat, who have seen comrades killed, who themselves have killed, find it difficult to talk about the experience, even with family and friends, who have never been to war. I mention that because it’s relevant to John Kerry’s campaign for the presidency. Here’s a distinguished combat veteran who was wounded three times and awarded three Purple Hearts. Questions have been raised by Kerry’s political opponents about the seriousness of at least one of those wounds. But the rules are simple, if you’re wounded in combat and require treatment by a medic, you get a Purple Heart. Again, Kerry has three of them. Also, he was awarded a Bronze Star for courage and a Silver Star for gallantry. Those are the kind of medals you showcase in a Presidential campaign. And the Kerry campaign has done just that. It has also surrounded the candidate with Vietnam-era veterans. The Senator clearly sees his service in Vietnam as a plus. The Bush campaign has responded by reminded voters that Kerry became a peace activist when he came home. That he tossed those medals over the Capitol fence, in protest against the war, or at least claimed to be doing so at the time. John Kerry and his war time service are clearly a centerpiece for his campaign for President. But if you expect him to talk about how he won that Silver Star, the most important of his medals, you’re likely to be disappointed. As I said at the outset, there are some things that some veterans just can’t or won’t talk about. Here’s more from ABC News correspondent Jake Tapper.

JAKE TAPPER, ABC NEWS

(Voice Over) 35 years after his return from Vietnam, John Kerry remains inextricably bound to that war. His campaign tries to use his decorated service in Vietnam, as seen in this ad campaign.

POLITICAL AD VOICE, MALE

In combat, he earned the Silver Star, the Bronze Star and three Purple Hearts. Then, he came home, determined to end that war.

JAKE TAPPER

(Voice Over) But his leadership of a Navy swift boat and his anti-war movement upon his return, are also areas his opponents sharply criticize.

REPUBLICAN, FEMALE

I remember watching Senator Kerry back when he was against the war, when he came home. And I was very troubled by the kind of allegations that he hurled against his fellow veterans, saying that they were guilty of all kinds of atrocities.

JAKE TAPPER

(Voice Over) Clearly, Lieutenant John Kerry’s four months in Vietnam and years in the anti-war movement shaped him. Such experiences provide some of his most humanizing moments. Reuniting with a man whose life he saved in the Mayhap River. They also cause some of his more visceral reactions, like in April, when Kerry was again about asked about an old controversy, whether he had thrown away medals to protest the Vietnam war.

SENATOR JOHN KERRY

This comes from a President and a Republican party that can’t even answer whether or not he showed up for duty in the National Guard. I’m not going to stand for it.

JAKE TAPPER

(Off Camera) It is clear, 29 years after the fall of Saigon, Vietnam is a war still being fought. If only in the hearts and minds of American voters.

SENATOR JOHN MCCAIN, REPUBLICAN, ARIZONA

At least, could we declare that the Vietnam war is over and have a cease-fire?

JAKE TAPPER

(Voice Over) Amidst all this heated political rhetoric and angry exchanges, what may be most intriguing about Kerry’s service in Vietnam, are the limits he has established. Limits as to what he will talk about. Because, perhaps more instructive about him than whether he threw away his medals is how he earned them. John Kerry won his Silver Star on February 28th, 1969. But he does not like to talk about it.

INTERVIEWER, MALE

How did you get the Silver Star?

SENATOR JOHN KERRY

You know, I got it surviving, I guess is the best way to put it. I think most people who walk around with medals in this country may be proud of medals. And I am. But are much more sort of thoughtful in remembering of the people that didn’t come home who are really the heroes. And I just am not comfortable sort of going into the story.

INTERVIEWER

Did you have to kill somebody in Vietnam?

SENATOR JOHN KERRY

It is a matter of record, what I did in Vietnam. And over the months that I was in combat, yes, we know that we were responsible for the loss of enemy lives. But that’s war.

INTERVIEWER

How did that affect you?

SENATOR JOHN KERRY

Well, I think it affects anybody who carries a gun in another country, shooting at other human beings. Unless you’re insensitive, it has an impact on you.

JAKE TAPPER

(Voice Over) He is not fully comfortable talking about it, even with his family.

VANESSA, DAUGHTER

And I said, well, what happened? And I was about seven. And he said, oh, the guy dropped it and ran away. And to be honest, it wasn’t until that two or three years ago that I actually learned that, you know, in the end, he actually killed someone.

INTERVIEWER

We spoke with your daughter Vanessa. And she said that when you told her the story of how you won your Silver Star in Vietnam, you omitted the fact that you had to kill another man. And I was wondering why.

SENATOR JOHN KERRY

I don’t know when I told her. I can’t remember when I told her the story. But, you know, that’s the ugly side of war that I think you want to put behind you.

JAKE TAPPER

(Voice Over) But close friends of Kerry say the events of February 28th, 1969, are not something he has put behind him. They are something he carries with him everyday. Killing a Vietcong sniper was, by all accounts, a defining moment for him, as a soldier and as a man.

Jan 1966

LYNDON BAINES JOHNSON,

36TH PRESIDENT OF UNITED STATES

War is always the same. It is young men dying in the fullness of their promise. It is trying to kill a man that you do not even know well enough to hate.

JAKE TAPPER

(Voice Over) Since Kerry will not talk about the day he killed a man, four of Kerry’s crew mates from his swift boat sat down to try to explain what happened. Though, not one was eager to revisit the events of that day. They had been conducting Operation Sea Lords, an operation that sent Navy swift boats deep into enemy territory.

DEL SANDUSKY, VIETNAM VETERAN

We were in ambushes and firefights, you know, one, two, three, four times a day. And we’d be on patrol for a day or two, sometimes on a special operation. Sometimes just on a regular patrol up and down the river. But mostly, it was special op.

JAKE TAPPER

(Voice Over) It was dangerous duty. ABC News correspondent Frank Mariana was on board a swift boat when it was attacked by Vietcong on both banks.

DAVID ALSTON, VIETNAM VETERAN

There’s really no way you can prepare someone for what we did or what we went through. Going in a river, you know, the enemy hear you. He know you coming. You don’t know where he is.

GENE THORSON

When you got a 50-foot boat, and you go up 18 feet high from the water up, you’re nothing but a floating target.

DEL SANDUSKY

I think it was shooting gallery. And we’re the little duck that goes this way and then comes back this way, right? We did it everyday.

FRED SHORT

I just assumed that every breath I took was my last breath. I had to put it in my mind that I was not coming back to endure what was going on.

JAKE TAPPER

(Voice Over) February 28th, 1969, was a day that started out badly and got much worse.

graphics: Nightline

ANNOUNCER

This is ABC News “Nightline.” Brought to you by …

commercial break

TED KOPPEL

(Off Camera) John Kerry and his crew mates were about to encounter the enemy, face-to-face. Part two, now, of Jake Tapper’s report.

JAKE TAPPER

(Voice Over) February 28th, 1969. Kerry and his crew mates were given a mission to take their swift boat up a canal off the Mayhap River. Surrounded by thick mangrove brush and many, many Vietcong.

DEL SANDUSKY

So, we on the 94 and two other boats went up, with some friendlies. And we had two ambushes.

FRED SHORT

I guess we had gotten 800 yards or 1,000 yards at the most. And this time, another B-40 rocket hit and maybe a couple more. But this one was close aboard. It blew the windows out of the -crew cabin. I see out of a spider hole, a Vietcong stand up dressed in a loin cloth, holding a B-40 rocket. Now, that’s an RPG, a rocket propelled grenade. It was designed for -to take out armor.

DEL SANDUSKY

Charlie would have lit us up like a Roman candle because we’re full of fuel, we’re full of ammunition.

JAKE TAPPER

(Voice Over) Protocol at the time would be for Kerry’s swift boat to fire to shore and then take evasive commanders. But Kerry ordered his second in command, Del Sandusky, to drive the swift boat onto the beach, directly into the ambush.

DEL SANDUSKY

I knew right away that, you know, uh-oh, we’re in the -doo-doo now. But, yeah, I knew, you know, John was intent. You know, we got to go and get this guy. There was no way we were going to back down off the beach.

DAVID ALSTON

I know when John Kerry told Del to beach that damn boat, this was a brand-new ball game. We wasn’t running. We took it to Charlie.

FRED SHORT

I would say, he was so close that I could see that he had a mustache, a very weak mustache, that he was growing. I could see the mustache on his face. And things were going slow-motion now, because you feel you were, you know -this is really getting scary.

DEL SANDUSKY

He needed like, 25, 30 yards to arm that rocket, all right. And as we beached, he could not aim it at us. So, he got up out of the spider hole, started running.

JAKE TAPPER

(Voice Over) Tommy Belodeau was manning the boat’s M-60 machine gun.

FRED SHORT

Tommy in the pit tank, winged him in the side of the legs, as he was coming across. But the guy didn’t miss stride. I mean, he did not break stride. He -like he was hopped up on something. He booked it. Maybe his adrenaline was coursing.

DEL SANDUSKY

John sized up the situation and realized that once Tommy had started shooting at the guy and wounded him in the leg, you know, that this was the only course of action -you know, John was going to chase this guy down and kill him. ‘Cause if he didn’t, we were all dead.

GENE THORSON

When we got to the bank, the man -was still running down a path. And Senator Kerry jumped up. Tommy Belodeau jumped off. And Michael McDarris.

JAKE TAPPER

(Voice Over) Seconds later, the three men, in hot pursuit, saw the Vietcong.

FRED SHORT

The guy was getting dread to stand up with a rocket on his shoulder, coming up. And Mr. Kerry took him out.

JAKE TAPPER

(Off Camera) How close was he?

FRED SHORT

He would have been about a 30-yard shot. Which, we were dead in the water up on the bank, point blank. If he missed us, he would have to, you know -there’s no way he could miss us. He could’ve thrown a rock and taken me out.

GENE THORSON

If this guy would have got up and -he had a clear shot at us. We would have been history. Wouldn’t have been no doubt about it.

FRED SHORT

And if that RPG had exploded in the pilot house or anywhere in that area, we were toast.

JAKE TAPPER

(Voice Over) Kerry and Medeiros searched his corpse, confiscated the rocket launcher and returned to the boat. Kerry did not speak of what he had just done. But for a Navy man, killing a man face-to-face was unusual.

DEL SANDUSKY

We usually didn’t see Charlie. So, to do an actual event like John did, you know, he never came back and displayed any symptoms or signs of problems that it bothered him. But I know it would have bothered me, you know, to do that actual, you know, kill a man, face-to-face.

FRED SHORT

When you’re close enough to see him, to count the whiskers on their face, to be that close to someone, it becomes very personal. And that would affect anyone, I would suspect.

JAKE TAPPER

(Voice Over) Kerry refuses to discuss in public how that event shook him and shaped him. And his crew will not betray matters he has told them in confidence about that moment. But Sandusky recalls a similar kill that affected him.

DEL SANDUSKY

We knew that he was up to no good. So, we ran over with the boat, sliced up his legs pretty good. We brought him onboard the boat. The Vietnamese interpreter that we had onboard interrogating him, trying to get some information out of him. But he couldn’t talk much, he was going into shock. But as he was dying, he was looking me in the eye. And I still get bad dreams every once in a while. I’ll wake up and I’ll see that death stare. Seeing death face-to- face, in a combat, you know, it has to be a similarity of people that have done it, you know, when you kill someone and you’re looking them in the eye. When John Kerry shot the guy, I don’t know if there’s a similarity there to what I went through.

JAKE TAPPER

(Off Camera) Back at the base, Kerry’s commander said, half tongue in cheek, he didn’t know whether banking the boat and chasing down the sniper merited Kerry a medal or a court-martial. But days later in Saigon, Kerry was awarded the Silver Star for valor by Vice Admiral Elmo Zeumwald, commander of Naval forces in Vietnam.

JAKE TAPPER

(Voice Over) Only weeks later, Kerry earned a Bronze Star for saving a Green Beret while wounded and under sniper fire. He also earned his third Purple Heart, which at the time meant he could be transferred home. It wasn’t until 1996, when he even talked to many of his crew again. That was the year that, in the midst of a tough Senate re-election contest, a “Boston Globe” columnist questioned the circumstances under which Kerry was awarded his Silver Star, wondering how much of a threat a wounded VC could really have posed. Called by the campaign to defend their former officer, the crew immediately flew to Boston. Including Tom Belodeau, who died one year later.

TOM BELODEAU, VIETNAM VETERAN

This man was more than capable of destroying that boat and everybody on it. Senator Kerry did not give him that opportunity. And for that reason, myself and three other people are here today.

JAKE TAPPER

(Voice Over) Kerry’s response that day, visceral in his emotions, vague in the details, is pretty close to his reaction to attacks on his service today.

SENATOR JOHN KERRY

This was a firefight, life or death. And it was that way every, single day. And for some desk jockey who wants to come in, who hasn’t seen a firefight in his life, to try to say that, that is just wrong.

JAKE TAPPER

(Off Camera) Kerry’s crew mates have experienced a wide variety of post-war reactions, ranging from alcoholism and posttraumatic stress disorder, to normal acclimation in society. Kerry himself, by all accounts, has dealt with his demons, though both his first and current wives have spoken about the Vietnam ghosts that cause him nightmares. Clearly, killing that VC was a necessary action. It also is one that has left a mark on the Senator. The precise effect we may never fully understand. I’m Jake Tapper, for “Nightline” in Washington.

TED KOPPEL

(Off Camera) So, do John Kerry’s Vietnam experiences help or hurt his Presidential campaign? That conversation when we come back.

commercial break

TED KOPPEL

(Off Camera) And joining me tonight, Adam Nagourney. He’s the chief political correspondent for “The New York Times” and has been covering the Presidential election since last year. I can’t say that I would have predicted that Vietnam would become an issue in this campaign. How much of an issue is it going to be? I mean, we’re four months away from election day.

ADAM NAGOURNEY, “THE NEW YORK TIMES”

Well, I think clearly, if Kerry has his way, his war record is going to be a central part of the campaign. From the very beginning, he sort of defined himself as a Vietnam veteran. And the fact that he served in the war has been a big part of his biography. The Republicans have made attempts to try to discredit it. I’m not sure how far -they can get away with that. We’ll see over the next couple of months. If they do, you could see a debate, given the nature of his service. ‘Cause it’s not only that he served in Vietnam, it’s that he came back and became one of the nation’s leading opponents of the war, as well. And that’s what Republicans focus on.

TED KOPPEL

(Off Camera) And of course, there’s another aspect to this that you haven’t referred to yet. And that is questions about the President’s own record when he was in the Air National Guard.

ADAM NAGOURNEY

See, I think that’s what complicates things for White House if they want to try to raise questions about Kerry. I mean, it just -once again, it tears open this whole wound of Vietnam, which I think still remains very strong. And if they want to try to discredit Kerry’s record, I mean, the bottom line is, the guy won five medals. And the President and Vice President found ways not to serve in Vietnam. So, they’re -in a complicated position as they try to do it. But I think that Vietnam is such a central part of Kerry’s biography and his existence and why it is that he won the Democratic nomination that there’s going to be a lot of pressure on Republicans to try to figure out a way to discredit it, if they can.

TED KOPPEL

(Off Camera) Where does this go from here on in? In other words, just today, Adam, up on the Hill, there was a vote. He hasn’t been in Washington much for voting. But it has to do with veterans benefits. And the Republicans, apparently, deliberately delayed the vote so that he would not be able to get to California -I’m talking about John Kerry, now, in order to, you know, for a fund-raising trip. Is it really going to descend to that level?

ADAM NAGOURNEY

I mean, as we were saying before, I think the Republicans, or certainly the White House, is constrained to the extent to which they can try to disrupt him on this. I don’t recall him ever coming back to Washington for a vote. That’s probably too strong. But it shows how important this is to his biography. So, I think, no matter what the Republicans are hoping or intending to do, you’re going to find that as we get closer to the convention, this is gonna become more and more a central part of his biography and the definition of why he would be a good President. And -while I think that’s relevant in any Presidential campaign, you know, military service, I think in this one, it’s going to be more relevant than ever. And I think -both sides get that.

TED KOPPEL

(Off Camera) On balance, in other words, you think it’s a big plus for him?

ADAM NAGOURNEY

I mean, especially in this year, when -you know, we’re looking at election when we’re talking about electing a war-time President. And I think President Bush’s approaching the election this way and Kerry’s approaching the election this way. And I think to present yourself as someone who’s been in battle and one war -at least, I mean, the whole rationale of Kerry as a candidate from the very beginning -and this is why, in my opinion, he won the Democratic primary, to a large extent. Was because he had the sort of military background. He’d been there. That he could compete with the President, who had led this country through this awful, awful time. And I think that’s going to become more and more clear as we get to the general elections.

TED KOPPEL

(Off Camera) Adam Nagourney, thank you.

ADAM NAGOURNEY

Thank you.

TED KOPPEL

(Off Camera) American soldiers were, once again, under fire in Iraq today. Details of that when we come back.

graphics: Nightline: Abcnews.com

ANNOUNCER

To receive a daily e-mail announcement about each evening’s “Nightline” and a preview of special broadcasts, logon to the “Nightline” page at abcnews.com.

commercial break

TED KOPPEL

(Off Camera) It was another deadly day in Iraq for Americans in the line of duty. Two soldiers were killed and one wounded when a military convoy was ambushed north of Baghdad.

TED KOPPEL

(Off Camera) That’s our report for tonight. I’m Ted Koppel in Washington. For all of us here at ABC News, good night.

“This is a wonderfully disturbing book, just as you might wish it to be. I did little else the past few days but read it. The writing, the research is awesome. I learned a lot about soldiering and modern warfare, kept wishing for unmanned drones (read The Panther), and my heart broke every time a soldier died. So unnecessary. Military decisions perhaps should be made by women. I learned a lot about counterinsurgency and how we have wasted millions of dollars, meanwhile under-preparing our soldiers for Afghanistan. It is a shanda (yiddish for ‘shameful.’) I could become an isolationist. After reading your book, I’m thinking of doing some kind of volunteer work with soldiers—in Pensacola, Fl, it shouldn’t be hard to find something that is worthwhile. Thank you for writing this book; I will now begin to read your others.”

— Pat Siegel Langnau

TAPPER: Pat, thank you so much for writing. It means a lot to me and it will mean much more the the troops and their families.

I spoke with former Staff Sergeant Clinton Romesha over the weekend, and as I expected he was completely humble about his pending Medal of Honor and quite sincerely expressed a desire for attention to be given instead to those who were killed during the horrible October 3, 2009 attack on Combat Outpost Keating, as well as to other troops who were brave that day, such as Brad Larson and Tom Rasmussen.

As you no doubt know, all of these troops have their stories told in my book “The Outpost: An Untold Story of American Valor,” and in the coming days and weeks I will work with Ro to have some of these tales shared to an even wider audience.

But for now, there is attention on Romesha (ROE-muh-shay), so we might as well make sure the media has better and more accurate photos of him than the old one the Army put out.

Here are two sent from his fellow troops — for more check out those posted at The Outpost Facebook page:

Photo courtesy of Zach Koppes.

Photo courtesy of Captain Stoney Portis.

More on Ro and his brothers to come —

— Jake Tapper

The White House announced this afternoon that President Obama will on February 11th award the Medal of Honor to Staff Sergeant Clint Romesha, formerly of 3-61 CAV, for his actions on October 3, 2009, when Combat Outpost Keating was attacked.

I know a little bit about Romesha (ROE-muh-shay) and the attack on COP Keating, having written a book about both, and I am so happy for both Ro and his buddies for this well-deserved honor.

There were many heroes that day, many of whom didn’t survive that attack, but Romesha is without question one of the bravest men I’ve ever known.

Romesha will only be the fourth living Medal of Honor recipient for actions in Iraq or Afghanistan. He retired from the Army in April 2011 and now lives in North Dakota with his wife and three kids.

In my book The Outpost: An Untold Story of American Valor, I decribe Romesha as:

an intense guy, short and wiry, the son of a leader of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints in Cedarville, California. His parents had hoped he would follow his father into the church leadership, and Romesha had in fact gone to seminary for four years during high school — from five till seven every morning — but ultimately, it just wasn’t for him. He didn’t even go on a mission, a regular rite for young Mormon men. Romesha was better suited to this kind of mission, with guns and joes under his command.

This doesn’t look anything like him, but the Army put it out today:

Here’s a better one, courtesy Sgt. Tom Rasmussen:

Combat Outpost Keating was located at the bottom of three steep mountains just 14 miles from the Pakistan border.

As you may know, on October 3, 2009, up to 400 Taliban — all of whom had the high ground — attacked the outpost. The battle was long and bloody. Eight U.S. troops were killed.

Here are some tidbits about Romesha during that October 3, 2009, battle, from the book.

After Taliban fighters have attacked the camp and reportedly entered it, Romesha:

stood on the deck off the aid station, in a semiprotected space known as the Café.

He’d had enough. He’d been trying to find out what was going on at LRAS‑2 when he spotted three Afghans by the shura building. Two had AK‑47s, the third an RPG. One was wearing camouflage, as the ANA troops often did. He turned to the Latvians, Lakis and Dabolins, who were standing just outside the operations center.

“You don’t have ANA on that side of the camp,” Romesha confirmed.

“No,” said Lakis.

So that was the enemy.

This is a gimme shot, Romesha thought. I couldn’t ask for a better shot. The insurgents walked by Stand‑To Truck 2, where they casually put down their weapons. They had entered Camp Keating unfettered, without being met by an ounce of resistance. One began adjusting his bandanna. They seemed to think the camp had been conquered.

They were wrong. Romesha fired and popped the fighter with the bandanna
through his neck; he fell like a sack of potatoes.

But enough Taliban get inside the camp that the men of Black Knight Troop, 3-61 CAV, begin pulling back and holding on to a few buildings, ceding their own camp to the enemy. Romesha does not accept this.

“We need to retake this fucking camp and drive the fucking Taliban out!” he says.

He runs to Red Platoon barracks.

“We’re about to take this bitch back,” he announced. “I need a fucking group of volunteers.” He got them: Thomas Rasmussen, Mark Dulaney, Josh Dannelley, Chris Jones, and Matthew Miller. They knew they were going to be utterly and completely outgunned, but they had no other option.

The surviving members of Black Knight Troop at Forward Operating Base Bostick, a few days after the 3 Oct 2009 Battle of COP Keating.

Congratulations, Romesha. Looking forward to seeing you.

-Jake Tapper

So word comes that, as long predicted, President Obama will nominate current White House chief of staff Jacob “Jack” Lew  to be the next Secretary of the Treasury.

The pick is no surprise — President Obama tends to nominate just the person whom you think he’s going to nominate. Lew’s liberal bona fides have progressives happy, and conservatives angry. 

Of some interest, though not of particular importance, is Lew’s bizarre signature, which first received widespread notice last Fall when it appeared on an Office of Management and Budget memo.

Hmm.

New York Magazine earlier today imagined what this squiggle might look like on a dollar bill.

I believe I speak for all of America when I say: “The horror. The horror.”

New York’s Kevin Roose cites several objects d’art that Lew’s John Hancock reminds him of, including the slinky and the hair of Peanuts’ Sally Brown.

Actually, as a failed cartoonist, I can report with authority that Lew’s signature most closely resembles what is referred to in cartooning as a spurl — these are the corkscrews emanating from a character’s head when he is hovering below or above consciousness.

You can see it right below over the head of the first man carrying the glass.

Another example can be seen among this 1925 curse word symbols found at the Statoids website.

And in these from Thimble Theater:

Names for these symbols were given by Beetle Bailey’s creator Mort Walker, who recalled:

“It started out as a joke for the National Cartoonists Society magazine. I spoofed the tricks cartoonists use, like dust clouds when characters are running or lightbulbs over their heads when they get an idea. My son Brian thought I should expand the idea and make a book of it. I spent many hours at the museum going over old cartoons and recording their ‘language.’

“I created pseudoscientific names for each cartoon cliché, like the sweat marks cartoon characters radiate. I called them ‘plewds,’ after the god of rain, ‘Joe Pluvius.’ I considered it a humor book.

“When it came out, I looked for it in the humor section of a bookstore and finally found it in Art Instruction. I inquired and they said, ‘What’s funny about it?’ I said, ‘The names.’ They said, ‘We didn’t know what those things were called.’ I said, ‘They weren’t called anything till I called them that.’ It was another case of satire falling flat. I gave up and am selling it now as an instruction book.”

In any case, as Marketplace pointed out earlier this year, outgoing Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner changed his illegible signature to fit the responsibility of signing our currency.

It went from  to .

One assumes Lew’s spurl will be similarly adjusted.

-Jake Tapper

I never met legendary reporter Richard Ben Cramer, author of perhaps the best campaign book of the modern era “What It Takes: The Way to the White House,” but his is a huge loss for our national understanding of issues large and small.

Before he wrote What It Takes, which details six candidates in the 1988 presidential race — Bush Sr., Dole, Dukakis, Gephardt, Biden and Hart, names I recall from memory from his vivid descriptions in the book I read nearly 20 years ago — he penned a definitive piece for Esquire about baseball legend Ted Williams.

Writing for the Washington Post in 1992, David Streitfeld recalled:

“Several years back he did a profile for Esquire on baseball legend Ted Williams. It was the definitive piece, the first big interview in eons, obsessively researched and written. It was also 15,000 words, which is itself a fair distance to the length of a book.

“Esquire, however, had allotted space for only 13,000 words, and was standing firm. There was no room to print more. But as writers often do, Cramer felt that not one word was expendable.

“So here’s what he did: Went to the magazine at 7 o’clock one night when he knew the editor wouldn’t be there. Told the copy editing department he had been given permission to restore the deleted material. Told the art department that a decision had been made to shrink the size of the type. Went to the production department and made sure the finished pages were immediately shipped off to the printer.

“The next day Cramer sent roses to the three departments, thanking them all for grace under pressure. There’s now reportedly a notice in the Esquire art department forbidding the presence of writers.”

(Cramer said the story, put forward by those promoting his book, was a tad exaggerated. He noted that what particularly ticked off Esquire was that he included the roses in his expenses.)

What It Takes (which Jack Shafer in 1992 called a “swift and beautiful barge of a book”) was six years and more than one thousand interviews in the making. If you haven’t read it yet, buy it today.

“I never set out to write a book about how did they win and how did they lose?” Cramer told NPR in 1992. “What I was trying to cover was what kind of life brings somebody to the point where they think they ought to be president. And then once they get into the process, what happens to that life? And it’s in the nature of this process that every one of these men has put himself and his family into a roll of the dice where five out of six will lose. So naturally there are some painful conclusions. And how they deal with the necessity of coming off the certainty that they will be president is exactly the story I set out to cover.”

“I think it’s an open question whether they’re fit to be president at the end of the process we’ve put them through,” he said. “But it’s also a terrible milling down of the person. I remember so vividly the—the sight of Michael Dukakis at the front of his big plane in a terrible—what I—what I came to call the Mediterranean hunch, with his shoulders up around his ears, not wanting to hear from anyone else that day. There was one night when he sat in the front of his plane and balanced his checkbook, so lonely was he for—for the life he had left behind.”

Rest in Peace, Mr. Cramer.

- Jake Tapper